metadata: {"signature": "0xa5678a0e2d602fd291bf3a2ec6dd64cbdab79527b901cba4298032e5aff4243650935a8b51d0042a8d7e9a302021ea7dbe75dcf9984e52c916e09b1ef8d94d181b", "application": {"round": "0xab7dca80a1aed7d85cba1179bdae3c9969228d07", "answers": [{"type": "email", "hidden": true, "question": "Email Address", "questionId": 0, "encryptedAnswer": {"ciphertext": "iQ1qlOqSpyv1oIlR1lyyeV3rqZ3Gk3wBSoTNSZU+SR5faFnjjmGzJ4CjUdP2IBra", "encryptedSymmetricKey": "505cfbd46fa5db54d054208a0a187c9cce3ef47dcacd1cbe498d1e02236491a5f625b981eca41d04cfbde9e458b06015b380ca67c526731d726b208afa4f0299785f9f042d88f880ac4d8b7389776fe1dcf13fedee69eac71d5491567d51d6916d42baf7672f517621bb5d05ea90689d3660bf64c42559239100f2deea47db1500000000000000200d0678da679bf2adb40b5a8f2b02ece60b56931aa4febacfc1d475150ebfeb2561d86999401c8d180979c5d9d0e1f6a3"}}, {"type": "short-answer", "answer": "@danimimm", "hidden": true, "question": "Telegram Handle", "questionId": 1}, {"type": "short-answer", "answer": "https://discord.gg/e3K7PhexEU", "hidden": true, "question": "Link to your Public Group Chat (Discord or Telegram, if applicable):", "questionId": 2}, {"type": "paragraph", "answer": "### Team composition and relevant experience of key members and Portfolio of previous work demonstrating relevant skills and expertise\n\n**Meet the team:**\n\n### Team Members\n\n#### Alex T. Netto\n**Role:** ED, Smart Contract Engineer  \n**Bio:** 9\u00ba Top ENS Delegate; Kernel Fellow; Zuzalian; Chainlink developer expert; Winner of more than 7 Hackathons including ETHS\u00e3o Paulo, ETHSamba, SmartCon, ETH Belgrade and ETHGlobal NY.  \n**Contact:** alex@blockful.io\n\n#### Guilherme Neves\n**Role:** Head of Smart Contract Engineering  \n**Bio:** Contributor to the blockchain ecosystem as an advisor in the Valocracy Manifesto article, and Open-source builder/community lead, built different applications in blockchain; Winner of 5 Hackathons, including 2 from Ethereum.  \n**Contact:** guilherme@blockful.io\n\n#### Daniela Zschaber\n**Role:** Product Manager  \n**Bio:** PM, Arbitrum delegate and active member, Chainlink Community Advocate; Postgraduate professor in Web3 MBAs and colleges; Winner of Ethereum Argentina Hackathon (reputation protocol) and ETH Belgrade Hackathon; Speaker at ETH Belgrade, Ethereum Argentina, SmartCon, ETH Denver and the main events in Brazil.  \n**Contact:** daniela@blockful.io\n\n#### Zeugh\n**Role:** Product Manager  \n**Bio:** A governance nerd, coming from experience design and local politics in Brazil. Working for multiple DAOs and creating others he\u2019s been dedicated to finding ways to improve community governance for the last three years and is part of the Blockful public goods R&D team.  \n**Contact:** zeugh@blockful.io\n\n#### Heron Lancellot\n**Role:** Frontend Developer  \n**Bio:** Web3 Frontend Developer, pursuing a Bachelor's degree in Information Systems at Federal Fluminense University, Open-Source contributor; Winner of 3 Hackathons, and building with purpose on the path of innovation.  \n**Contact:** heron@blockful.io\n\n#### Rafael Sanches\n**Role:** FullStack Developer  \n**Bio:** FullStack Developer specializing in Web3 technologies, with over three years of experience as a Cyber Security Consultant at PwC. Actively contributed to numerous open-source projects, with commitment to innovation and community growth. Driven by a passion for decentralized solutions, I seek to contribute to the Web3 landscape by creating secure, scalable, and user-centric applications that empower individuals and reshape the digital economy.  \n**Contact:** rafael.sanches@blockful.io\n\n---\n\n**Meet Blockful:**\n\n// about blockful\n\n\n\ud83c\udf31 _We build in public (goods) to optimize human coordination through open-source._\n\n\nWe work with DAOs to increase their longevity by participating, researching and **improving governance** and protocol development. \n\n\ud83d\udd17 More (and cool) info here: [meet blockful](https://www.notion.so/meet-blockful-485f6957ddb14a7c833d9240d393119c?pvs=21) \n\n### Relevant/recent contributions to the ecosystem\n\n\ud83d\udfe9 Blockful addressed a critical governance risk in the ENS DAO related to delegate power imbalances. We implemented a proposal utilizing the veto proposer role to ensure balanced decision-making and established a Security Council to oversee contract updates and audits. \n **Check the proposal:** \n[[EP5.7][Social] Security Council](https://snapshot.org/#/ens.eth/proposal/0xf3a4673fe04a3ecfed4a2f066f6ced1539a5466d61630428333360b843653c54)\n\n\n\ud83d\udfe9 ENS - [[EP5.2] [Executable] Commence Streams for Service Providers](https://snapshot.org/#/ens.eth/proposal/0x6ba81cd2997288cc49ae1b95921ec8f107e8ffb9733321d53d488e2b30710b86)\n\n\ud83d\udfe9 Shutter DAO 0x36 - [Proposal to Launch an RFP for Auditing the Technical Contribution in Developing Staking](https://snapshot.org/#/shutterdao0x36.eth/proposal/0x3e9bc3988c7209c5d0a0e860713baf2235e08b14438e21414a7a4ee8a5bc4347)\n\n\ud83d\udfe9 Shutter DAO 0x36 - [Select A Dev House on Retainer](https://snapshot.org/#/shutterdao0x36.eth/proposal/0x8de85c46dc7306d88fcba27f39ea161aeb771b4186849b45bf9026cdf4adccb6)\n\n[*This is a feedback from avsa (ENS co-founder) about our deliveries and work ethics.*](https://twitter.com/avsa/status/1572259073994924037)", "hidden": true, "question": "Please detail your team's experience in development and smart contract design:", "questionId": 3}, {"type": "paragraph", "answer": "In 2023, I won the Ethereum Argentina hackathon with a reputation protocol, making our team the only one to receive three awards across all the tracks we applied for. At Blockful, we specialize in governance, giving us extensive experience with reputation systems and related technologies. Additionally, I have delivered talks on reputation at ETH Belgrade 2024 and ETH Denver 2024.\n\nIn the context of resource allocation, I understand reputation as a system where grantees can evaluate grant programs. Through attestations via the Ethereum Attestation Service (EAS) and scores generated by Trustful, we aim to build a reputation over time based on the user-program interaction. This approach will enable us to assess the impact of grant programs, the support provided to grantees, and ultimately improve resource allocation. By doing so, we can attract high-quality builders to the ecosystem.\n\nIn essence, the continuous use and quality assessments of grant programs by grantees, recorded on-chain through badges, will ensure that the reputation and quality of grant programs remain immutable and transparent, facilitated by attestations.", "hidden": true, "question": "Describe your understanding of reputation systems and how you plan to implement one in the context of the Web3 Grant Registry:", "questionId": 4}, {"type": "paragraph", "answer": "### Timeline and milestones for the development and integration of the reputation system/Budget and cost breakdown\n\n### Milestone Overview\n\n#### Research and Initial Setup\n**Period:** July 16 - July 23  \n**Description:**  \n- Conduct research for creating scores\n- Analyze grants\n- Collect feedback from grantees\n- Begin development of the badge import interface\n- Start integration with Karma GAP frontend  \n**Value:** $10,000 ARB\n\n#### Attestation Issuance, EAS Connection, and Evaluation Badge Issuance\n**Period:** July 24 - August 6  \n**Description:**  \n- Implement an interface for grantees to select badge types and digitally sign evaluations using the EAS system\n- Develop the connection to EAS for managing attestations using standardized schemas\n- Store and validate created attestations\n- Enable grantees to issue badges like \"Supporter Reviewer\" and \"Well Written Grant,\" signing attestations for validation\n- Add new badge types and corresponding points  \n**Value:** $16,000 ARB\n\n#### Specific Evaluation Criteria and Recording\n**Period:** August 7 - August 13  \n**Description:**  \n- Define each badge as an evaluation criterion with an associated point value\n- Implement the function to return points associated with a badge type\n- Ensure issuance and recording of attestations in the EAS contract  \n**Value:** $7,000 ARB\n\n#### Grant Program Recognition and Validation\n**Period:** August 14 - August 20  \n**Description:**  \n- Develop functionality for the grant program to recognize and validate grantee participation\n- Implement cumulative scoring of the grant program\n- Finalize and test the complete system  \n**Value:** $7,000 ARB\n\n#### Final Review and Deployment\n**Period:** August 21 - August 25  \n**Description:**  \n- Conduct a final review of the entire system\n- Implement final adjustments and improvements\n- Deploy the system to production  \n**Value:** $5,000 ARB\n\n### Total Value\n**Total:** $45,000 ARB", "hidden": true, "question": "Provide a breakdown of your project timeline, including major milestones and deliverables:", "questionId": 5}, {"type": "short-answer", "answer": "https://github.com/blockful-io/trustful-zuzalu (consider that this is our repo created for ZuVillage Georgia, where Trustful MVP will be tested soon)", "hidden": true, "question": "Project GitHub Repo (Not Team Page):", "questionId": 6}, {"type": "paragraph", "answer": "Our team is proficient in utilizing zkSNARKs and other technologies; however, in discussions with Mahesh, we have agreed that incorporating this technology will be part of the next phase of the project's scope.", "hidden": true, "question": "Describe your experience with privacy-preserving technologies like zkSNARKs, if any:", "questionId": 7}, {"type": "paragraph", "answer": "**Handling ongoing maintenance and support during the build, testing, and launch phases is crucial for the success of any project. Here\u2019s how we plan to manage it:**\n\n**1. Build Phase:**\n   - **Regular Check-ins:** We will have regular team meetings to track progress, address any issues, and ensure alignment with project goals.\n   - **Code Reviews:** Implementing a robust code review process to maintain code quality and identify potential issues early.\n   - **Automated Testing:** Establishing automated testing pipelines to catch bugs and errors quickly, ensuring the stability of new features.\n\n**2. Testing Phase:**\n   - **Comprehensive Testing:** Conducting extensive testing, including unit tests, integration tests, and end-to-end tests, to validate the functionality and performance of the system.\n   - **Bug Tracking:** Using a detailed bug tracking system to log, prioritize, and resolve issues efficiently.\n   - **User Feedback:** Engaging early users and testers to provide feedback and identify areas for improvement.\n   - **Weekly Evaluations:** Conducting weekly evaluations and feedback sessions through the Cartographers Syndicate communication channel to ensure continuous improvement and alignment with user needs.\n\n**3. Launch Phase:**\n   - **Monitoring:** Setting up real-time monitoring and alert systems to keep track of the system's performance and detect any anomalies immediately.\n   - **Support Team:** Having a dedicated support team ready to assist users with any issues they encounter, ensuring a smooth user experience.\n   - **Documentation:** Providing thorough documentation and training materials to help users understand and utilize the system effectively.\n   - **Ongoing Communication:** Maintaining ongoing contact and weekly evaluations through the Cartographers Syndicate communication channel to address any emerging issues and gather user feedback.\n\n**Throughout all phases, our team will maintain open communication channels to quickly address any emerging issues and ensure continuous improvement. This proactive approach will help us deliver a reliable and high-quality product.**\n", "hidden": true, "question": "How will you handle ongoing maintenance and support during the build, testing, and launch phases?", "questionId": 8}, {"type": "paragraph", "answer": "### Budget Breakdown\n\n- **July 16 - July 23:** $10,000 ARB - Research, analysis, and initial development\n- **July 24 - August 6:** $16,000 ARB - Development of attestation issuance, EAS connection, and evaluation badge issuance\n- **August 7 - August 13:** $7,000 ARB - Definition of evaluation criteria and recording\n- **August 14 - August 20:** $7,000 ARB - Development of grant program recognition and validation\n- **August 21 - August 25:** $5,000 ARB - Final review, adjustments, and deployment\n\n**Total:** $45,000 ARB\n\n*Note: The budget is primarily allocated for team payments.*\n", "hidden": true, "question": "Please provide a detailed budget breakdown for the requested ARB allocation:", "questionId": 9}, {"type": "paragraph", "hidden": true, "question": "Is there anything else you'd like to share about your project, previous work, or other relevant experience that may help determine your eligibility for this grant?", "questionId": 10}], "project": {"id": "0x0b153c67ad84c88c8c608563e97be87793517a3a2daf25fe6d684a76ac6e6c02", "title": "Trustful", "logoImg": "bafkreideyjyz6oj3zow5l4aqt4ywvk25ltcv2egedaepz424y2ixdnfjim", "metaPtr": {"pointer": "bafkreidwy2nzaatizdh33kwutnvnp665gl6n72udpddgxt5yesbvhq6z3q", "protocol": "undefined"}, "website": "https://blockful.io", "bannerImg": "bafkreicv2hsoky46iwxbzvhawuy6mco6qkc7kxpsaub5uzf6mw7xn6aa5e", "createdAt": 1720060823794, "userGithub": "danimim", "credentials": {"github": {"type": ["VerifiableCredential"], "proof": {"jws": "eyJhbGciOiJFZERTQSIsImNyaXQiOlsiYjY0Il0sImI2NCI6ZmFsc2V9..Y_PCgxRaboL3r4WYKqd9n4qlVxMG2w97bR1aDNBcJe8GeuYuQOgKNZPsuz2BwQyuSrW5V7EcTWcSSbnnQAJDDQ", "type": "Ed25519Signature2018", "created": "2024-07-04T02:39:15.952Z", "proofPurpose": "assertionMethod", "verificationMethod": "did:key:z6MkghvGHLobLEdj1bgRLhS4LPGJAvbMA1tn2zcRyqmYU5LC#z6MkghvGHLobLEdj1bgRLhS4LPGJAvbMA1tn2zcRyqmYU5LC"}, "issuer": "did:key:z6MkghvGHLobLEdj1bgRLhS4LPGJAvbMA1tn2zcRyqmYU5LC", "@context": ["https://www.w3.org/2018/credentials/v1"], "issuanceDate": "2024-07-04T02:39:15.951Z", "expirationDate": "2024-10-02T02:39:15.952Z", "credentialSubject": {"id": "did:pkh:eip155:1:0x3b9F47629cD4D5903cF3eB897aaC4F6b41Dd2589", "hash": "v0.0.0:rKB5cCxs8IllMgFvDgDIDejRTF6tsbNWlIocILMfAck=", "@context": [{"hash": "https://schema.org/Text", "provider": "https://schema.org/Text"}], "provider": "ClearTextGithubOrg#blockful-io#91672926"}}, "twitter": {"type": ["VerifiableCredential"], "proof": {"jws": "eyJhbGciOiJFZERTQSIsImNyaXQiOlsiYjY0Il0sImI2NCI6ZmFsc2V9..QsJjWOJIORaGNqvvWhwMyonLMmYlr30z5yxYG4tDFGMMw-u2BeP-05JEM1V_zT9LrcMxjV1ZmPWVnATvHjrLCg", "type": "Ed25519Signature2018", "created": "2024-07-04T02:39:03.840Z", "proofPurpose": "assertionMethod", "verificationMethod": "did:key:z6MkghvGHLobLEdj1bgRLhS4LPGJAvbMA1tn2zcRyqmYU5LC#z6MkghvGHLobLEdj1bgRLhS4LPGJAvbMA1tn2zcRyqmYU5LC"}, "issuer": "did:key:z6MkghvGHLobLEdj1bgRLhS4LPGJAvbMA1tn2zcRyqmYU5LC", "@context": ["https://www.w3.org/2018/credentials/v1"], "issuanceDate": "2024-07-04T02:39:03.840Z", "expirationDate": "2024-10-02T02:39:03.840Z", "credentialSubject": {"id": "did:pkh:eip155:1:0x3b9F47629cD4D5903cF3eB897aaC4F6b41Dd2589", "hash": "v0.0.0:mJJGJIyq7uzJuFlNe75X9UPISO9vwh7zQOEQdd7n9Jw=", "@context": [{"hash": "https://schema.org/Text", "provider": "https://schema.org/Text"}], "provider": "ClearTextTwitter#blockful_io"}}}, "description": "### TL;DR\n\nThis proposal outlines the second phase of the Trustful MVP, a Reputation Aggregator System. In this phase, we will aggregate onchain data to evaluate grants programs. After researching evaluation methods, we will collect and attest (through EAS) grantee opinions onchain, assigning reputations to these programs.\n\n---\n\n### **What are you building:**\n\nA Reputation Aggregator System designed to evaluate addresses (members, grants programs, DAOs, etc.). By aggregating onchain data such as past grantees, community support, defined milestones, detailed grant scopes, and contributions to the ecosystem, we aim to match high-quality grants with future builders. This will make resource allocation fairer and support data-driven decision-making for applicants.\n\n---\n\n### **Project Vision:**\n\nThe project is an experiment in the field of on-chain reputation and aims to address gaps still present in the ecosystem, such as Proof of Humanity, Verifiable Track Record of Past Contributions, and [**Valocracy.**](https://www.notion.so/f1ca6d59fad54ab9a8aa15924026a05f?pvs=21)\n\n*\u201cHence, \u201cValocracy\u201d: A novel and structured social, economic, and political framework that attempts to leverage blockchain technology in order to create new forms of organizations with the goal of empowering communities along with their individuals and their combined efforts.\u201d*\n\n---\n\n### Addressed problems\n\n1. **Verifiable track record of past: Fair Resource Allocation and Role Assignment**\n1.1 Lack of a Verifiable Track Record: Many grants distributed have funded unfinished projects or projects where the project creator vanished. This misallocation of resources not only wastes funding but also undermines the trust and effectiveness of the grant system. Ensuring that grants are directed towards projects with a proven track record of completion and sustained engagement is crucial for fostering a productive ecosystem.\n1.2 Arbitrariness in role selection decisions: Roles should be assigned to individuals with extensive knowledge and building experience in specific areas. Decisions should be based on verifiable reputation \u2013 contribution-based role assignment. This is also a factor in the selection of reviewers and enhances the support of these individuals leading the grants programs to the grantees.\n\n**2. Enhancing Grant Program Effectiveness Through Strategic Principles**\n\n2.1 Fair Resource Allocation: Ensure that resources are allocated based on the quality and potential impact of proposed projects, rather than solely on the amount requested or on who requested. This includes evaluating methodologies, the projected positive impact on relevant communities or sectors, and the long-term sustainability of the project.\n\n2.2 Quality of Impactful Projects: Emphasize projects that demonstrate innovation, technical feasibility, and strong execution capabilities. Evaluation metrics should include detailed work plans, strategic partnerships, and clear, measurable outcomes.\n\n2.3 Transparency and Accountability: Track if a Grant Program maintain a transparent and accountable selection process. This involves publicly disclosing evaluation criteria, engaging multiple stakeholders in decision-making, and implementing mechanisms for fund accountability.\n\n2.4 Promotion of Innovation and Collaboration: Encourage proposals that foster innovation within the ecosystem and promote collaboration among diverse stakeholders. This can be facilitated through thematic challenges, mentoring programs, or networking opportunities for grant recipients.\n\n**3. Enhanced Applicant/Project Quality:** \n\n3.1 Implement strategies to attract and select high-quality applicants by enhancing the grants program's reputation: This approach boosts engagement and ensures decisions are guided by individuals recognized for their expertise within specific areas of the ecosystem. It also attracts projects aligned with the program's commitment to ecosystem growth.\n\n---\n\n### **Why does this product matter for Cartographer Syndicate?**\n\n- **Advanced Technological Integration:** Implementing a reputation aggregator like Trustful allows Cartographer Syndicate to integrate robust on-chain data for grant programs. This enables users to access comprehensive, verifiable information about grants directly on the Karma GAP page.\n- **Enhanced Transparency and Reliability:** By leveraging on-chain data, the Cartographers Syndicate can provide transparent and reliable insights into grant programs. This includes details on program clarity, reviewer quality, platform usage metrics, and ongoing support, fostering trust among stakeholders.\n- **Improved Decision-Making:** The protocol enhances decision-making by offering clear, data-driven metrics for assessing grant program effectiveness. This ensures that grants are directed towards projects with proven track records and impactful outcomes, thereby optimizing resource allocation.\n\n---\n\n## **Architecture/Development Process:**\n\n### Badge Import Interface\n\n**Purpose:** Allows grantees to select the grant program and import evaluation badges.\n\n- **Function: `createAttestation(address grantProgram, string memory badgeType)`**\n    - **Description:** Allows grantees to create an attestation for a grant program using EAS.\n\n### Scorer Creation and Management\n\n**Purpose:** Interface to create and manage scorers who evaluate grant programs.\n\n- **Function: `createScorer(string memory scorerName)`**\n    - **Description:** Allows the creation of a new scorer with a specific name.\n- **Function: `selectScorer(address scorer)`**\n    - **Description:** Allows selection of an existing scorer for managing evaluations.\n\n### Attestation Issuance\n\n**Purpose:** Interface for grantees to select badge types and digitally sign evaluations using the EAS system.\n\n### Integration with Karma GAP Frontend\n\n**Purpose:** Interacts with the Karma GAP frontend to fetch available grant programs and enable grantees to make evaluations directly on the platform.\n\n### Connection to EAS\n\n**Purpose:** Manages attestations using standardized schemas for validation and interaction.\n\n- **Storage and Validation:** Stores and validates grantee-created attestations, ensuring integrity and transparency.\n- **Immutable Records:** Creates immutable attestation records to ensure trust and traceability.\n\n### Evaluation Badge Issuance\n\n**Purpose:** Grantees issue badges like \"Supporter Reviewer\" and \"Well Written Grant,\" signing attestations for validation.\n\n- **Function: `addBadgeType(string memory badgeType, uint256 points)`**\n    - **Description:** Adds a new badge type and corresponding points.\n\n### Specific Evaluation Criteria\n\n**Purpose:** Each badge represents an evaluation criterion with an associated point value (e.g., \"Supporter Reviewer\" is worth 10 points, \"Well Written Grant\" is worth 2 points).\n\n- **Function: `getBadgePoints(address grantProgram, string memory badgeType)`**\n    - **Description:** Returns points associated with a badge type.\n- **Issuance and Recording:** Badge issuance generates an attestation recorded in the EAS contract.\n\n### Grant Program Recognition and Validation\n\n**Purpose:** The grant program recognizes and validates grantee participation, confirming attestations and showcasing the program's competence.\n\n- **Cumulative Scoring:** The total score of the grant program is the sum of points from assigned badges.\n- **Function: `getGrantScore(address grantProgram)`**\n    - **Description:** Returns the cumulative score of a grant program.\n\n---\n\n\ud83d\udea7 _This roadmap and proposal represent initial scopes of work. As a secondary plan, we may include zkSNARKS and other features required in the RFP. However, our initial focus will be on the reputation technology for grant programs._\n\n_Please note that this is an initial scope and may be subject to improvements and, consequently, changes as necessary. Adjustments will be made in accordance with integrations with Karma GAP to ensure that the reputation system aligns optimally with the proposed requirements._\n\n\n### Timeline and milestones for the development and integration of the reputation system/Budget and cost breakdown\n\n### Milestone Overview\n\n#### Research and Initial Setup\n**Period:** July 16 - July 23  \n**Description:**  \n- Conduct research for creating scores\n- Analyze grants\n- Collect feedback from grantees\n- Begin development of the badge import interface\n- Start integration with Karma GAP frontend  \n**Value:** $10,000 ARB\n\n#### Attestation Issuance, EAS Connection, and Evaluation Badge Issuance\n**Period:** July 24 - August 6  \n**Description:**  \n- Implement an interface for grantees to select badge types and digitally sign evaluations using the EAS system\n- Develop the connection to EAS for managing attestations using standardized schemas\n- Store and validate created attestations\n- Enable grantees to issue badges like \"Supporter Reviewer\" and \"Well Written Grant,\" signing attestations for validation\n- Add new badge types and corresponding points  \n**Value:** $16,000 ARB\n\n#### Specific Evaluation Criteria and Recording\n**Period:** August 7 - August 13  \n**Description:**  \n- Define each badge as an evaluation criterion with an associated point value\n- Implement the function to return points associated with a badge type\n- Ensure issuance and recording of attestations in the EAS contract  \n**Value:** $7,000 ARB\n\n#### Grant Program Recognition and Validation\n**Period:** August 14 - August 20  \n**Description:**  \n- Develop functionality for the grant program to recognize and validate grantee participation\n- Implement cumulative scoring of the grant program\n- Finalize and test the complete system  \n**Value:** $7,000 ARB\n\n#### Final Review and Deployment\n**Period:** August 21 - August 25  \n**Description:**  \n- Conduct a final review of the entire system\n- Implement final adjustments and improvements\n- Deploy the system to production  \n**Value:** $5,000 ARB\n\n### Total Value\n**Total:** $45,000 ARB\n\n---\n\n### Team composition and relevant experience of key members and Portfolio of previous work demonstrating relevant skills and expertise\n\n**Meet the team:**\n\n### Team Members\n\n#### Alex T. Netto\n**Role:** ED, Smart Contract Engineer  \n**Bio:** 9\u00ba Top ENS Delegate; Kernel Fellow; Zuzalian; Chainlink developer expert; Winner of more than 7 Hackathons including ETHS\u00e3o Paulo, ETHSamba, SmartCon, ETH Belgrade and ETHGlobal NY.  \n**Contact:** alex@blockful.io\n\n#### Guilherme Neves\n**Role:** Head of Smart Contract Engineering  \n**Bio:** Contributor to the blockchain ecosystem as an advisor in the Valocracy Manifesto article, and Open-source builder/community lead, built different applications in blockchain; Winner of 5 Hackathons, including 2 from Ethereum.  \n**Contact:** guilherme@blockful.io\n\n#### Daniela Zschaber\n**Role:** Product Manager  \n**Bio:** PM, Arbitrum delegate and active member, Chainlink Community Advocate; Postgraduate professor in Web3 MBAs and colleges; Winner of Ethereum Argentina Hackathon (reputation protocol) and ETH Belgrade Hackathon; Speaker at ETH Belgrade, Ethereum Argentina, SmartCon, ETH Denver and the main events in Brazil.  \n**Contact:** daniela@blockful.io\n\n#### Zeugh\n**Role:** Product Manager  \n**Bio:** A governance nerd, coming from experience design and local politics in Brazil. Working for multiple DAOs and creating others he\u2019s been dedicated to finding ways to improve community governance for the last three years and is part of the Blockful public goods R&D team.  \n**Contact:** zeugh@blockful.io\n\n#### Heron Lancellot\n**Role:** Frontend Developer  \n**Bio:** Web3 Frontend Developer, pursuing a Bachelor's degree in Information Systems at Federal Fluminense University, Open-Source contributor; Winner of 3 Hackathons, and building with purpose on the path of innovation.  \n**Contact:** heron@blockful.io\n\n#### Rafael Sanches\n**Role:** FullStack Developer  \n**Bio:** FullStack Developer specializing in Web3 technologies, with over three years of experience as a Cyber Security Consultant at PwC. Actively contributed to numerous open-source projects, with commitment to innovation and community growth. Driven by a passion for decentralized solutions, I seek to contribute to the Web3 landscape by creating secure, scalable, and user-centric applications that empower individuals and reshape the digital economy.  \n**Contact:** rafael.sanches@blockful.io\n\n---\n\n**Meet Blockful:**\n\n// about blockful\n\n\n\ud83c\udf31 _We build in public (goods) to optimize human coordination through open-source._\n\n\nWe work with DAOs to increase their longevity by participating, researching and **improving governance** and protocol development. \n\n\ud83d\udd17 More (and cool) info here: [meet blockful](https://www.notion.so/meet-blockful-485f6957ddb14a7c833d9240d393119c?pvs=21) \n\n### Relevant/recent contributions to the ecosystem\n\n\ud83d\udfe9 Blockful addressed a critical governance risk in the ENS DAO related to delegate power imbalances. We implemented a proposal utilizing the veto proposer role to ensure balanced decision-making and established a Security Council to oversee contract updates and audits. \n **Check the proposal:** \n[[EP5.7][Social] Security Council](https://snapshot.org/#/ens.eth/proposal/0xf3a4673fe04a3ecfed4a2f066f6ced1539a5466d61630428333360b843653c54)\n\n\n\ud83d\udfe9 ENS - [[EP5.2] [Executable] Commence Streams for Service Providers](https://snapshot.org/#/ens.eth/proposal/0x6ba81cd2997288cc49ae1b95921ec8f107e8ffb9733321d53d488e2b30710b86)\n\n\ud83d\udfe9 Shutter DAO 0x36 - [Proposal to Launch an RFP for Auditing the Technical Contribution in Developing Staking](https://snapshot.org/#/shutterdao0x36.eth/proposal/0x3e9bc3988c7209c5d0a0e860713baf2235e08b14438e21414a7a4ee8a5bc4347)\n\n\ud83d\udfe9 Shutter DAO 0x36 - [Select A Dev House on Retainer](https://snapshot.org/#/shutterdao0x36.eth/proposal/0x8de85c46dc7306d88fcba27f39ea161aeb771b4186849b45bf9026cdf4adccb6)\n\n[*This is a feedback from avsa (ENS co-founder) about our deliveries and work ethics.*](https://twitter.com/avsa/status/1572259073994924037)", "lastUpdated": 0, "projectGithub": "blockful-io", "projectTwitter": "blockful_io"}, "recipient": "0x000ee9A6Bcec9AadCc883bD52B2c9A75FB098991"}}