metadata: {"signature": "0x0cb0a3577ec809459d4b4549ea833cfce5db52ec2c66dd3b691494a16784e87d4658c28911407e77af357eb41a1a7ca80d28ca357c520f5deed7c64eee7c72ee1b", "application": {"round": "0xa7608d95a93cc684f2719323d40cbd0f59afe7d4", "answers": [{"type": "email", "hidden": true, "question": "Email Address", "questionId": 0, "encryptedAnswer": {"ciphertext": "hjPg11fCiv4NBqJfF/CZIyt+1AxqbWeI5o43OHwCGw7wVYwpQtd/GghEvDtNwdHN", "encryptedSymmetricKey": "b6fb59a8508e92ddda94f5206ed7f66be82b964cafeb06e9f6395671b6476b1dec2cf71ee59c5507a29359b2fd8340019e0f0774f39b40edf5bd18f51b7fd7ccc44e89822bec66afa227526a9bb71a2fc171e6dacff4f8d63d3fe9857e9486a4925937b6fb331ab48706508a5ca7b925df375ea2266625916769235b79079721000000000000002004ed250ce417b05526ed892ef1be431240b7ec9010c4a45460fba26113db12b350f4ae3c7a7b8540d64dd6d17184af98"}}, {"type": "short-answer", "answer": "NA", "hidden": false, "question": "Funding Sources", "questionId": 1}, {"type": "number", "answer": "2", "hidden": false, "question": "Team Size", "questionId": 2}, {"type": "link", "answer": "", "hidden": true, "question": "Provide a link to your profile or CV (or you are welcome to email us at hello@metagov.org and confirm here that you have emailed us)", "questionId": 3}], "project": {"id": "42161:0x73AB205af1476Dc22104A6B8b3d4c273B58C6E27:299", "title": "Ethereum Dispute Resolution Ecosystem Mapping Initiative", "logoImg": "bafkreihnanmhwg7csqdrnmjezdq43njfyroxzix2q4pw7g3wy7334u2dxm", "metaPtr": {"pointer": "bafkreicmrgyihnw7i7ne3kjloshzqvbjvduorr3jkqoet3zwxjuxug35fu", "protocol": "1"}, "website": "https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=4365558", "bannerImg": "bafkreib2iojzp7kxsl3u4fqkji2x3gfuhl7jwwyilckgnrhjmmxeyrhzom", "createdAt": 1700564973742, "credentials": {}, "description": "The motivation behind this research initiative stems from the need to address the challenges and complexities associated with dispute resolution within the Ethereum ecosystem. As the decentralized space continues to grow, the increasing prevalence of smart contracts and decentralized applications (DApps) has led to a rising demand for effective and transparent dispute resolution mechanisms.\n\nThe primary objective of this research is to provide a clear and detailed understanding of the various dispute resolution platforms operating on Ethereum. The initiative will investigate the mechanisms employed by these platforms, assessing their strengths, weaknesses, and unique features. This research will extend from decentralized on-chain arbitration systems to more traditional off-chain models, encompassing a broader spectrum of dispute resolution strategies in the Ethereum ecosystem. \n\nAnticipated Outcome:\n\nWe aim to produce a comprehensive map that highlights the diversity and functionality of Ethereum dispute resolution platforms. This map will serve as a valuable resource for developers, stakeholders, and the broader Ethereum community, providing insights into the array of options available for addressing disputes within the decentralized ecosystem. The goal is to enhance understanding of the tools available to ensure fairness, justice, and efficiency in the decentralized space.\n\nHow? \n\nTo achieve these objectives, the research initiative will employ a multi-faceted approach:\n\nComprehensive Review: Conduct an exhaustive review of existing literature, whitepapers, and documentation related to dispute resolution platforms on Ethereum.\n\nPlatform Analysis: Evaluate the mechanisms, strengths, weaknesses, and unique features of diverse dispute resolution platforms, covering both on-chain and off-chain models.\n\nCase Studies: Examine real-world case studies and examples of dispute resolution instances within the Ethereum ecosystem to gain practical insights.\n\nStakeholder Interviews: Engage with developers, users, and stakeholders involved in Ethereum dispute resolution platforms to gather firsthand experiences and perspectives.\n\nData Compilation: Systematically compile and categorize the gathered information to create a comprehensive map detailing the different dispute resolution platforms.\n\nReport Generation: Summarize the findings in a detailed report, highlighting key patterns, trends, and recommendations for developers, stakeholders, and the Ethereum community.\n\n\nAbout Us: \nLed by Jamilya Kamalova, a researcher and a PhD Candidate specializing in governance issues and dispute resolution in the web3  (LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jamilya-kamalova-3860ba198/), our research initiative is supported by Alexandre Perez, who specializes in DAO governance (LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandre-perez-40ba8895/). \n\nJamilya's most recent publications: \n- Kamalova, Jamilya, Exploring Blockchain-Based Alternative Dispute Resolution: Limitations of Traditional Methods and Prospects for Further Research. (2023). Harvard Negotiation Law Review (Forthcoming).\n- Ast, Federico and George, William and Kamalova, Jamilya and Sharma, Abeer and Aouidef, Yann, Decentralized Justice: State of the Art, Recurring Criticisms and Next Generation Research Topics (https://doi.org/10.3389/fbloc.2023.1204090)  (April 10, 2023). \n- Merk, Tara and Cossar, Sofia and Kamalova, Jamilya, Ethnographic Research of Proof of Humanity DAO (Investigaci\u00f3n Etnogr\u00e1fica de Proof of Humanity DAO). (January 24, 2023). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4438414 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4438414\n\n\nBoth team members are associated with Kleros.io, a pioneering on-chain dispute resolution provider.\n", "lastUpdated": 0, "projectTwitter": ""}, "recipient": "0xFAA16eB4B1d8ffba5e7a65319b545Cd6660484ED"}}